Archive for September, 2011

Stimulate Your Thinking – Coaching Others: Use Active Listening Skills

Tuesday, September 27th, 2011

Coaching others isn’t always easy. Daily pressures and demands often overtake our work, leaving limited time and energy to focus on coaching direct reports.

While formal coaching sessions may be few, you can fit in coaching conversations and coaching moments. CCL defines coaching as “formal or informal conversations between a leader coach (you) and a learner (someone else) intended to produce positive changes in workplace behaviors.”

To increase your opportunities for coaching, pay attention to the cues others are sending. If someone is upset, not ready to talk or needing to vent, then just hear them out. They need a safe place to air thoughts and emotions but aren’t ready for a coaching conversation.

Coaches use active listening techniques when people are ready to identify problems and find solutions. Cues that someone is open to coaching include, “Can you help me think things through?” “I’d like to bounce some ideas off of you.” “Could you give me a reality check?” “I need some help.”

In these moments, seven active listening skills can help turn a typical conversation into a coaching opportunity.

  1. Be attentive. Convey a positive attitude to the learner (the “coachee”) and a willingness to talk through the situation. If timing is a problem, let the other person know you are interested and commit to a time for the two of you to have a focused conversation. During the conversation, remind yourself that your role is not to interrogate the coachee, jump to advice-giving or solve the problem yourself. Listen. Near the end of the conversation, you need to be able to accurately summarize the coachee’s main ideas, concerns and feelings. Allow “wait time” before responding. Don’t cut the coachee off, finish his or her sentences or start formulating your answer before he/she has finished. Be conscious of your body language.
  2. Ask open-ended questions. These encourage the coachee to do the work of self-reflection and problem-solving, rather than justifying or defending a position, or trying to guess the “right answer.” Examples include: What do you think about …? Tell me about …? Please further explain/describe …?
  3. Ask probing questions. Again, the emphasis is on asking, rather than telling. It invites a thoughtful response by the coachee and maintains the spirit of collaboration. You might say:”What are some of the specific things you’ve tried?” “Have you asked the team what their main concerns are?” “Does Emma agree that there are performance problems?” “Are there any issues in your own leadership style that might be contributing to the situation?” “How certain are you that you have the full picture of what’s going on?”
  4. Request clarification. Double check any issues that are ambiguous or unclear to you. Say something like, ”Let me see if I’m clear. Are you talking about …?” or “Wait a minute. Try that again. I didn’t follow you.” if you have any doubt or confusion about what the coachee has said.
  5. Paraphrase. Recap the coachee’s key points periodically. Don’t assume that you understand correctly, or that the coachee knows you’ve heard. For example, your coachee might tell you,”Emma is so loyal and supportive of her people – they’d walk through fire for her. But, no matter how much I push, her team keeps missing deadlines.” To paraphrase, you could say, ”So Emma’s people skills are great, but accountability is a problem.”
  6. Be attuned to and reflect feelings. Identify the feeling message that accompanies the content. This is an effective way to get to the core of the issue. When you hear, ”I don’t know what else to do!” or ”I’m tired of bailing the team out at the last minute,” try to help the coachee label his or her feelings: ”Sounds like you’re feeling pretty frustrated and stuck.”
  7. Summarize. Give a brief restatement of core themes raised by the coachee: ”Let me summarize to check my understanding. Emma was promoted to manager and her team loves her. But you don’t believe she holds them accountable, so mistakes are accepted and keep happening. You’ve tried everything you can think of and there’s no apparent impact. Did I get that right?”

Once the situation has been talked through in this way, both you and the coachee have a good picture of where things stand. From this point, the conversation can shift into problem-solving. What hasn’t been tried? What don’t we know? What new approaches could be taken?

As the coach, continue to query, guide and offer, but don’t dictate a solution. Your coachee will feel more confident and eager if he or she thinks through the options and owns the solution.

Performance vs. Development

Although there can be considerable overlap between performance and development coaching techniques and conversational elements, the key distinctions are:

Performance Coaching Focuses On: Development Coaching Focuses On:
Short term Long term
Outside in Inside out
What the learner does Who the learner is and how he thinks
Problem-solving Understanding
Judgment/evaluation Curiosity
Speed Patience
One right answer Multiple right answers / options
Tactical fixing of behaviors needed now Growth and learning over time

The Paradox of Toxic Leadership

Thursday, September 22nd, 2011

Everyone knows the type.  The “take no prisoners” leader who gets things done despite the collateral damage.  The leader who prioritizes maintaining and enhancing his or her reputation within the organization above all else.  The leader who refuses to consider subordinates’ morale or basic humanity in pursuit of on-time deliverables.  The leader who others follow out of fear, not respect. The question is whether the short term results these leaders produce are worth the potential damage left in their wake.

A June 2011 report for the United States Army by the Center for Army Leadership (available here) identified common behaviors attributed to toxic leaders to include “avoiding subordinates, behaving aggressively toward others, denigrating subordinates, hoarding information, hoarding job tasks, blaming others for their own problems, [being] overly critical of work that is done well, and intimidating others.”  The Army study focused on toxic leadership because “under worst case scenarios, toxic leadership in the Army can lead to mutiny and death.”

While the consequences of toxic leadership in your organization are likely to fall short of “mutiny and death,” the Army report noted that toxic leadership might also lead to “a whole host of relatively less serious, but still troubling outcomes” including “erosion of trust, reduced effectiveness, commitment and retention, break-downs in essential communication, and diminished follower well-being.”

The Army report succinctly outlined the paradox of toxic leadership, however, noting that “toxic leaders are usually not incompetent or ineffective leaders in terms of accomplishing explicit mission objectives” and that “many times they are strong leaders who have ‘the right stuff’, but just in the wrong intensity, and with the wrong desired end-state, namely self-promotion above all else.”

Presented with this paradox, how can an organization effectively identify and handle the threat of toxic leadership?  Here are a few steps that can help:

  1. Pay Attention – understanding how the leaders in your organization operate is key to the identification and correction of toxic leadership behaviors.  Develop review systems that solicit and compile candid information regarding leaders from superiors and subordinates so that leaders can be fully evaluated.
  2. Value Healthy Processes – rewarding leaders based solely on end-result performance metrics creates an environment where toxic leadership can thrive. Making a commitment to look behind results to examine processes is essential to clearly evaluating the health of your organization.
  3. Communicate Clear Expectations – a clear and explicit public commitment to healthy leadership by top-level management allows both leaders and followers to work from a common understanding of acceptable leadership methods.
  4.  Equip Leaders to Be Non-Toxic – an organizational commitment to non-toxic leadership cannot be effective unless the organization educates its leaders regarding healthy leadership through some combination of formal performance reviews, formal training, and mentoring.
  5. Fire Toxic Leaders – once identified, toxic leaders must be rooted out for the long-term good of the organization.

There are many tools to accomplish these steps and combat toxic leadership in your organization.  If you are ready to start a campaign against toxic leadership, Dame Management Strategies is fully equipped to assist with both planning and executing this effort.

Stimulate Your Thinking – Ten Tips for Leading by Example

Monday, September 12th, 2011
It’s easy to complain about the boss sometimes. Many of us are guilty of the “If I were running things, it would be different!” rant among co-workers. But, it’s not always easy being on top and the boss likely doesn’t always associate you with blue skies and rainbows either. Take the initiative in your organization in employee relations, go above and beyond to create a happier, more productive work environment.1.  Adult Whining

This  is not only unappealing, in the workplace it is especially annoying. Providing details about troubles with the neighbors to how the noise above your desk is affecting your ability to think clearly all the time, is not what your boss had in mind when asking, “How’s your day?”

Conversely, don’t overdo it; the boss’s idea was probably not the best thing since sliced bread or the joke she just told knee-slapping material. Your boss wants feedback on meeting company objectives in a positive and constructive manner. Not a yes person or a naysayer.

2. The Sky is Falling
Closely related to adult whining is the attitude that the world is against us. There will be things that are out of your control. These things may not even be influenced by your boss. The CEO just slashed the budget. A customer went to a competitor. Economic conditions are not favorable. These situations happen, and now it is time to deal with the aftermath. Complaining about the situation will not help. Let’s have conversations about what is possible.

3. Approval Denied
Don’t bring in theories or proposals to your superiors that have not been thoroughly researched. For example, outsourcing can transfer unsolved issues to a third party and often create new issues. Installing a new software package is not going to increase efficiency overnight. There are many factors to consider like the upfront cost of these solutions or the hassles of defining new processes and procedures. Do the required legwork to recognize those factors. Bosses are much more grateful when comprehensive plans, ready for action are presented to them for approval (that’s why they hired you).

4. Got Transparency?
Do not bury important information in a six-page report or an email trail or fake that you don’t how to do a task to get out of doing a project. Don’t swearing you didn’t get a report or email and  then when you discover you did get this information create an elaborate excuse; own up to it.

If you made a mistake, don’t hide it. Your boss knows that mistakes happen. He wants you to learn from them. If less than favorable news or results arise, just tell the boss. It will build his confidence in you either way. So speak up, take your punches, and be accountable for your actions.

5. Put it to Pen and Paper
Bottom Line, come to the meeting prepared. If you boss calls you into the office-it isn’t for a nice chat- bring pen and paper to take notes or your laptop. When given a project, it is at that time to ask questions, not a week later. And be up to date on the progress of your assigned projects for meetings or when the boss stops by to ask, “How is it going?”

6. Weak and Meek
This one is especially true for women. Stop apologizing for problems, mistakes or issues that are not your fault or responsibility, just to avoid conflict. This may be endearing at home but, this is a place of business and conflict is part of the package. Avoiding difficult conversations only delays the quandary. This includes shifting responsibility just to avoid giving bad news or hiding behind email or voicemail.

7. In the Eyes of a Child
There should be no need to blind copy someone, especially your boss in an email. It is childish. It is akin to running home to tell Mom. Grow up; if you are going to copy your boss on the email do it in the open and state why you decided to include him or her in the conversation.

8. Email Wars
Other annoying behaviors your boss hates: the email war and the email saga. The volleying of emails back and forth, especially if you are copying the boss or what can seem like the entire company, will put you on the fast track to nowhere. Do not send important messages or begin conservations about real issues via email. Email can’t convey body language or voice tone-you’re going to sound worse than you mean to. After the second email it is time to pick up the phone. Oh and do you really think your boss wants to be included in this useless electronic debate? Answer: No!

Also, edit yourself in email. Don’t take 15 minutes or four pages to explain that could be done in five minutes or two paragraphs. Your boss is not interested in your ability to wax poetic about issues, problems or even solutions. Emails are for data. Don’t write anything else in them.

9. Sitting on the sidelines
There is trouble a-brewing! Do you think the boss did not notice that all you did was keep your head down hoping the storm will pass? Doing nothing is not a strategy and will be the fastest way to get notice for the wrong reasons.

Another way to get noticed for the wrong reasons is stating you don’t have time or your plate is too full. This is passive-aggressive behavior and this is not a critical success factor. Not getting into the mix of things, makes you seem disorganized or not a team player. Step up to the plate; sit down with the boss and prioritize activities to determine together if you can take on more responsibilities.

10. Work or Play
A break in everyday communication will make the boss wonder. Are you really working hard? In the current workplace, it is not uncommon to have virtual offices or to have “work from home” arrangements. Stay in contact throughout the day with the boss. Be available for conference calls. Share your calendar. Find ways to keep in touch. But not too much!

Boss and employee relations are not always easy to navigate. The lines between being on the up-and-up and being a kiss up can be fine, as can the lines between go-getter and get going. However, management at every level is in a position to take leadership and foster changes it wants in an organization. Leading by example is a highly effective method for engaging and inspiring other to follow suit, creating a loyal and more productive workforce throughout any organization.

About the Author(s)

Mary Hladio is CEO of Ember Carriers Inc.

Leadership Atrophy: An Unintended Side Effect of Strong Leadership?

Thursday, September 8th, 2011

So you’re a dynamic and effective leader.  All your employees are invested in your vision for the company.  They know their roles, trust your business acumen implicitly, and depend on you to lead them well.  Candid 360 degree reviews confirm how much your employees value and rely on your leadership.  You are effectively and profitably steering your company through these tough economic times.

Everything seems perfect, right?  In the short term, the answer is probably a resounding “Yes.”  In all honesty, you may be truly indispensable.  You may also be immensely gratified by your personal importance to the organization and derive significant self-worth from your employees’ reliance on your leadership.  In the mid- to long-term, however, you may be at serious risk of jeopardizing your company’s future health by fostering leadership atrophy in your organization.

One definition of “atrophy” is “a wasting away or progressive decline.”  Leadership atrophy is the wasting away or progressive decline of employees’ leadership skills when leadership is centralized in one key person, particularly a dynamic individual such as the founder of a business or a charismatic CEO.

Few, if any, key employees are hired or survive for long in a competent business organization if they are totally devoid of leadership skills.  However, stripped of any expectation that they will lead, or opportunities to actually lead, your employees’ leadership skills will wither away over time.

The potential consequences or leadership atrophy within an organization are dire.  Most importantly, no one lives forever.  As Steve Jobs’ recent resignation hammers home, the stark reality is that someone else will eventually run the business in which you have invested so much or your life.  If you allow the leadership skills of your employees to atrophy as a result of your strong leadership, your succession planning will be infinitely more difficult due to a lack of strong successor candidates within the organization.

Leadership atrophy also detrimentally impacts the day-to-day life of the leader.  Do you get sucked into making decisions that are within your employees’ areas of responsibility under the guise of “making sure you are on board?”  Is your inbox crammed with email traffic on which you are copied “just to keep you in the loop,” but which really is an implicit invitation for you to weigh in on issues better left to your employees?  Do your employees constantly interrupt your vacations seeking your input on less-than-critical issues?  Such distractions limit your ability to focus on strategic planning and effectively manage your business.

To avoid leadership atrophy, here are a few key steps you can implement:

  1. Be self-aware and refuse to be seduced by the pleasures of overreliance on your leadership;
  2. Clearly communicate your expectations regarding your employees’ scope for exercising leadership;
  3. Cultivate practical opportunities for your employees to exercise leadership at all levels of responsibility;
  4. Invest in developing your employees’ leadership skills through formal training.

There are many tools to accomplish these steps, however, the key step is the first.  Until the leader takes a stand against leadership atrophy, there can be no progress.  If you are ready to take this first step, Dame Management Strategies is fully equipped to assist you in combating leadership atrophy in your organization.

-JD

Stimulate Your Thinking – The Limits of Talent

Tuesday, September 6th, 2011

It’s easy to be impressed by the natural leader, the brainy student, the gifted musician or the star athlete. “What talent!” we think. But talent alone doesn’t lead to success, says Carol Dweck, noted psychologist and author of Mindset: The New Psychology of Success. “Success comes with a growth mindset.”

People with a “growth mindset” believe that ability or talent can be developed, says Dweck. In contrast, people with a “fixed mindset” see ability as built-in: “You either have it or you don’t.”

Dweck’s research has shown that our beliefs about innate talent can either support or stifle success. If you have a growth mindset, you are willing to take risks, accept mistakes and seek out chances to learn. You become resilient and view setbacks and challenges as learning opportunities.

The belief that you can’t improve your ability actually stunts achievement. If you have a fixed mindset, you feel the pressure to repeatedly prove yourself in areas of “strength” and you avoid activities and experiences that may reveal weaknesses. As a result, you don’t gain the experiences, perspectives or skills that are needed to succeed at work or adapt to change. A fixed mindset also makes it hard to admit to or correct mistakes.

Dweck has also challenged the view that innate ability fuels self-confidence. In the short-term, people feel good and confident because of their natural abilities – until setbacks or challenges cause them to question themselves. People with a growth mindset derive self-confidence from the very act of taking on challenges and pursuing them with vigor.

What are the implications of Dweck’s work for leaders? “To succeed in a world where our work is always changing, where challenges are unpredictable and competition abounds, we need to be agile learners,” says CCL’s President and CEO, John Ryan. “We need to apply our new knowledge. Perhaps most of all, we need to believe we can rise to the challenge.”

“By taking on a growth mindset, we can learn new behaviors and modify deep-set behaviors at any age,” Ryan continues. “It takes hard work and real focus, but all of us really can learn new and effective behaviors – and help take our organizations to new levels of performance.”

Dweck agrees. “If an organization believes in natural talent, they are not developing the potential talent,” she says. “Not only are these organizations missing out on a big pool of possible leaders, but their belief in natural talent might actually squash the very people they think are the naturals, making them into defensive nonlearners. The lesson is: Create an organization that prizes the development of ability – and watch the leaders emerge.”

Which mindset do you have?

Answer these questions about intelligence. Read each statement and decide whether you mostly agree or disagree with it.

  1. Your intelligence is something very basic about you that you can’t change very much.
  2. You can learn new things but you can’t really change how intelligent you are.
  3. No matter how much intelligence you have, you can always change it quite a bit.
  4. You can always substantially change how intelligent you are.

Questions 1 and 2 are fixed mindset questions. Questions 3 and 4 reflect the growth mindset. Which mindset did you agree with more?

You also have beliefs about other abilities. You could substitute artistic talent, sports ability or business ability for intelligence. Or personal qualities, too. Try it.

Adapted from Mindset: The New Psychology of Success by Carol Dweck.