Posts Tagged ‘Management’

The Paradox of Toxic Leadership

Thursday, September 22nd, 2011

Everyone knows the type.  The “take no prisoners” leader who gets things done despite the collateral damage.  The leader who prioritizes maintaining and enhancing his or her reputation within the organization above all else.  The leader who refuses to consider subordinates’ morale or basic humanity in pursuit of on-time deliverables.  The leader who others follow out of fear, not respect. The question is whether the short term results these leaders produce are worth the potential damage left in their wake.

A June 2011 report for the United States Army by the Center for Army Leadership (available here) identified common behaviors attributed to toxic leaders to include “avoiding subordinates, behaving aggressively toward others, denigrating subordinates, hoarding information, hoarding job tasks, blaming others for their own problems, [being] overly critical of work that is done well, and intimidating others.”  The Army study focused on toxic leadership because “under worst case scenarios, toxic leadership in the Army can lead to mutiny and death.”

While the consequences of toxic leadership in your organization are likely to fall short of “mutiny and death,” the Army report noted that toxic leadership might also lead to “a whole host of relatively less serious, but still troubling outcomes” including “erosion of trust, reduced effectiveness, commitment and retention, break-downs in essential communication, and diminished follower well-being.”

The Army report succinctly outlined the paradox of toxic leadership, however, noting that “toxic leaders are usually not incompetent or ineffective leaders in terms of accomplishing explicit mission objectives” and that “many times they are strong leaders who have ‘the right stuff’, but just in the wrong intensity, and with the wrong desired end-state, namely self-promotion above all else.”

Presented with this paradox, how can an organization effectively identify and handle the threat of toxic leadership?  Here are a few steps that can help:

  1. Pay Attention – understanding how the leaders in your organization operate is key to the identification and correction of toxic leadership behaviors.  Develop review systems that solicit and compile candid information regarding leaders from superiors and subordinates so that leaders can be fully evaluated.
  2. Value Healthy Processes – rewarding leaders based solely on end-result performance metrics creates an environment where toxic leadership can thrive. Making a commitment to look behind results to examine processes is essential to clearly evaluating the health of your organization.
  3. Communicate Clear Expectations – a clear and explicit public commitment to healthy leadership by top-level management allows both leaders and followers to work from a common understanding of acceptable leadership methods.
  4.  Equip Leaders to Be Non-Toxic – an organizational commitment to non-toxic leadership cannot be effective unless the organization educates its leaders regarding healthy leadership through some combination of formal performance reviews, formal training, and mentoring.
  5. Fire Toxic Leaders – once identified, toxic leaders must be rooted out for the long-term good of the organization.

There are many tools to accomplish these steps and combat toxic leadership in your organization.  If you are ready to start a campaign against toxic leadership, Dame Management Strategies is fully equipped to assist with both planning and executing this effort.

Leadership Atrophy: An Unintended Side Effect of Strong Leadership?

Thursday, September 8th, 2011

So you’re a dynamic and effective leader.  All your employees are invested in your vision for the company.  They know their roles, trust your business acumen implicitly, and depend on you to lead them well.  Candid 360 degree reviews confirm how much your employees value and rely on your leadership.  You are effectively and profitably steering your company through these tough economic times.

Everything seems perfect, right?  In the short term, the answer is probably a resounding “Yes.”  In all honesty, you may be truly indispensable.  You may also be immensely gratified by your personal importance to the organization and derive significant self-worth from your employees’ reliance on your leadership.  In the mid- to long-term, however, you may be at serious risk of jeopardizing your company’s future health by fostering leadership atrophy in your organization.

One definition of “atrophy” is “a wasting away or progressive decline.”  Leadership atrophy is the wasting away or progressive decline of employees’ leadership skills when leadership is centralized in one key person, particularly a dynamic individual such as the founder of a business or a charismatic CEO.

Few, if any, key employees are hired or survive for long in a competent business organization if they are totally devoid of leadership skills.  However, stripped of any expectation that they will lead, or opportunities to actually lead, your employees’ leadership skills will wither away over time.

The potential consequences or leadership atrophy within an organization are dire.  Most importantly, no one lives forever.  As Steve Jobs’ recent resignation hammers home, the stark reality is that someone else will eventually run the business in which you have invested so much or your life.  If you allow the leadership skills of your employees to atrophy as a result of your strong leadership, your succession planning will be infinitely more difficult due to a lack of strong successor candidates within the organization.

Leadership atrophy also detrimentally impacts the day-to-day life of the leader.  Do you get sucked into making decisions that are within your employees’ areas of responsibility under the guise of “making sure you are on board?”  Is your inbox crammed with email traffic on which you are copied “just to keep you in the loop,” but which really is an implicit invitation for you to weigh in on issues better left to your employees?  Do your employees constantly interrupt your vacations seeking your input on less-than-critical issues?  Such distractions limit your ability to focus on strategic planning and effectively manage your business.

To avoid leadership atrophy, here are a few key steps you can implement:

  1. Be self-aware and refuse to be seduced by the pleasures of overreliance on your leadership;
  2. Clearly communicate your expectations regarding your employees’ scope for exercising leadership;
  3. Cultivate practical opportunities for your employees to exercise leadership at all levels of responsibility;
  4. Invest in developing your employees’ leadership skills through formal training.

There are many tools to accomplish these steps, however, the key step is the first.  Until the leader takes a stand against leadership atrophy, there can be no progress.  If you are ready to take this first step, Dame Management Strategies is fully equipped to assist you in combating leadership atrophy in your organization.

-JD